After two episodes focused on rebuilding institutions and repairing trust, Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Episode 3 deliberately pulls back from galactic politics and turns inward. “Vitus Reflux” isn’t about the Federation proving itself to the galaxy but rather whether the people meant to inherit it can work together when adults stop hovering. That shift works. In fact, it’s exactly what the series needed.
Starfleet Academy Episode 3 centers on a prank war-turned-war game between Starfleet Academy and the War College, a competition the leadership knowingly allows to play out. What begins as mischief quickly becomes a stress test. For leadership, it’s less about winning and more about watching how these cadets behave when structure loosens, and ego fills the gaps.
The contrast between the two institutions sharpens here. The War College frames the competition as dominance; victory as proof of superiority. Chancellor Ake (Holly Hunter), by contrast, treats it as development. Her references to The Art of War, patience, and strategy aren’t about passivity, but restraint. She understands that leadership isn’t forged by crushing opponents, but by learning when not to.
Starfleet Academy Episode 3 pits two groups against each other, revealing their strengths and weaknesses.

Calica, the laser-tag-meets-tactical-simulator scenario itself, feels intentionally playful without losing stakes. It highlights the Academy cadets’ core weakness early on: they aren’t a unit. They’re talented individuals operating on parallel tracks. Where the War College relies on rigid hierarchy and brute force, the Academy cadets are forced to adapt, improvise, and collaborate in ways they haven’t had to yet. That’s where Starfleet Academy Episode 3 really clicks.
Genesis (Bella Shepard) and Darem (George Hawkins) step into the spotlight here, jockeying for leadership in a group full of future commanders. Both are capable, both are privileged in different ways, and both are trying to live up to expectations shaped by their parents. The lesson lands cleanly: being good at everything doesn’t automatically make you a good leader. Authority without trust fractures quickly.
Caleb Mir (Sandro Rosta), interestingly, recedes slightly in Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Episode 3, and that’s a strength, not a flaw. Freed from the constant pressure of chasing his mother, Caleb is finally allowed to be what he hasn’t been in years: a kid. He’s still sharp, still skeptical of “games” that resemble the survival scenarios he’s lived through, but he’s no longer carrying the entire narrative weight. His leadership here is quieter, rooted in teamwork rather than defiance.
The ensemble gets its moments to breathe and grow, allowing us to home in on different players.

That breathing room allows other characters to shine. SAM (Kerrice Brooks)’s identity as a hologram becomes functionally important rather than thematic background, reinforcing that her differences aren’t symbolic; they’re practical assets. Her arc continues to echo the early Uhura energy from Strange New Worlds: underestimated, essential, and steadily growing into her own voice.
Starfleet Academy Episode 3 also continues developing the complicated relationship between Caleb and Tarima (Zoë Steiner). Tarima’s choice to attend the War College, driven by her desire for emotional control and discipline, reframes her as something more than a love interest. She isn’t rejecting Starfleet Academy. She’s choosing a different way to survive within the same broken system. That nuance matters.
Unlike “Beta Test”, which occasionally sidelined supporting cadets, Starfleet Academy Episode 3 finally gives the ensemble room to breathe. The humor lands more consistently, the character dynamics feel intentional, and the competition format provides a clean framework for growth without reverting to spectacle featured in the premiere of the season.
But what elevates “Vitus Reflux” most is Chancellor Ake’s presence. She makes it clear early on that she’s letting this play out intentionally. Some of these cadets didn’t grow up privileged. Some arrived in shipping crates. Shutting everything down in the name of order would miss the point. Growth requires friction, and sometimes the best leadership move is to step back and let people fail safely.
Humor lands better in this episode, marking a much-improved difference since the series’s start.

Patience ultimately becomes the defining lesson of Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Episode 3, not passivity, but emotional discipline. Chancellor Ake’s strategy isn’t about outmuscling the War College; it’s about outlasting them. By leaning into empathy, restraint, and emotional intelligence, traits often dismissed as weaknesses, the Academy cadets can overcome the War College’s physical and tactical advantages.
Ake’s centuries of lived experience quietly guide every choice here. Even in her quirkiness, there’s an intentional refusal to handhold. She’s teaching by allowing mistakes, trusting that these cadets can become better than she ever was. Not by fighting harder, but by learning how to stop fights before they start. By the final moments, Caleb begins to grasp that difference clearly: the War College exists to win wars, while Starfleet Academy exists to end them. Strategy, empathy, and patience aren’t secondary skills; they’re the point.
What Starfleet Academy Episode 3 ultimately understands is that leadership isn’t forged through domination or victory, but through presence. Showing up for others, across cadets, cultures, and even instructors, becomes the real measure of strength. Emotional literacy isn’t a soft skill in “Vitus Reflux”; it’s the foundation of lasting peace. In a galaxy eager to prove power through force, Starfleet Academy reminds us that Starfleet’s greatest weapon has always been knowing when not to use one.
Starfleet Academy Episodes 1-3 are streaming now on Paramount+ with new episodes every Thursday.
Previous Episode | Next Episode
Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Episode 3
-
Rating - 8.5/108.5/10
TL;DR
What Starfleet Academy Episode 3 ultimately understands is that leadership isn’t forged through domination or victory, but through presence.






